Sediment Problems of Irrigation Canals: Field Studies to Assess
the Changes in Canals Profiles and Cross Sections
Dr. Taha Mohammed Tahir
Dr. Eng Abdulla Abdulkader Noman
Abstract
Wadi Zabid is one of the main agricultural Wadis in the Tihama
Plain. Wide ranges of crops have been cultivated such as cereals,
vegetables, fruits, and some cash crops like cotton, sesame
and tobacco. It has provided the country with high valued
food basket as well as exporting to the neighboring countries.
The government realized the importance of Wadi Zabid and started
in 1979 constructing diversion works and canals to maximize
the agricultural output of the Wadi. During the past twenty
years of operations, sediment deposition in front of the diversion
works and along the canal system posed serious threats to
the project network. Sediment deposition caused many problems
such as blocking the off take pipes and gates, raising canal
beds and reducing canals slope, increasing the field levels
and reducing canal flow capacity. This study would assess
the changes in canal sections and profiles at which the present
canal profiles and sections are drawn and compared with the
canal profiles and sections of the previous years to provide
sound basis for problems assessment. Laboratory experiments
and sieve analysis were conducted to analyze canal bed samples
in order to draw recent grading curves and compared it with
the previous grading curves of the canals. This study exposed
the fact that canal sections and profiles are changed greatly
due to the accumulation of sediments in the upper reaches
of the canals whilst equilibrium sections and profiles existed
in the middle parts with section erosion in the lower parts
of the canal reaches. It also indicated that greater sediments
sizes were deposited in the canal upper reaches, which meant
that canal behavior is changed and does not work as it was
designed for.
Key words: Sediments, Irrigation
Canals, Profile, and Cross-section
1. Introduction
1.1 General Description of the
Study Area
Yemen Republic is located in
the southwestern corner of the Arabian Peninsula (figure 1.1).
In the western part of Yemen is the Tihama coastal plain,
bordered to the west by the Red Sea and to the east by the
mountains. The Tihama plain is a semi-arid coastal plain,
which is 25- 45 km wide. The total cultivated land is about
500,000 ha which is used to produce various cereal, vegetable
and different crops. More than 30% of the Tihama plain consists
of alluvial fans, crossed by seven major Wadis originating
from the mountains in the east as shown in figure (1.1). These
seven Wadis have steep bed slopes of 0.5 to 100 and their
flows are characterized by series of multi-peak flash floods
(spates). The water flows in a series of multi-peak flash
floods.
The discharge in this Wadi may rise to more than 1000 , returning
to less than 1 in 4 to 10 hours and the flow velocities can
exceed 4 m/s [1].
Settlement in the Tihama plain has been dependent on flood-spreading
techniques of Wadi flows for irrigation, which have been developed
over many years. In order to make best use of the agricultural
potential of the Tihama plain, the Ministry of Agricultural
and Water Resources planned a single-wadi development strategy,
starting from the three major wadis; Zabid, Rima and Mawr.
Major irrigation development projects have been completed
in the three wadis (Zabid (1979), Mawr (1984) and Rima (1988)).
1.1.1 Wadi Zabid
Wadi Zabid is the second major
Wadi after Wadi Mawr in the Tihama plain (see table 1.1).
Wadi Zabid runs east west direction from the foothills of
Ibb Governorate with a total length of 250 km. It contains
one of the oldest and most highly developed traditional spate
systems in the Tihama plain and was the first area given funding
for development.
Wadi Zabid's climate is generally
described as tropical with a rainy summer and dry winter.
The annual rainfall varies from 100 mm near the Red Sea coast
to 600 mm in the foothills. The annual rainfall in the catchments
area of the Wadi ranges from 400 to 600 mm/yr, which increases
in some years up to 1000 mm [2].
There are two rainfall seasons and one dry season in Wadi
Zabid:
1. The first wet season from March to May: rainfall occurs
in the middle and upper catchments areas of the Wadi and generates
floods.
2. The second wet season from May to September: rainfall occurs
in the Tihama plain and in the Wadi catchments also [3].
3. The dry season from October to March: a strong southerly
wind is predominate and there is seldom rainfall.
The annual average temperature
in the area is 30.5 0C, the maximum is 43.6 0C and the minimum
is 15.00C as measured in the FAO camp at Jerbah station in
1970. The annual sunshine duration was 2760 hours during the
year 1970 (7.6 hrs on average). The relative humidity ranges
from 15% to 98% with an annual average of 65% [3]
Wadi Zabid traditional irrigation
system consists of 16 main supply canals, which divert flash
floods and base flow from the Wadi to the fields by means
of deflectors or dykes crossing the Wadi bed. The structures
are made from poorly compacted earthen materials (soil, gravel,
tree branches and boulders). Hence these structures are often
damaged or completely destroyed by medium to large floods
[4].
In Zabid area basin irrigation
has been practiced for centuries and water was distributed
by a field -to-field method. The water rights in the Tihama
Wadis declare the priority of higher lying area over lower
lying ones in diverting water from the Wadi for irrigation
(Al Aala-Fal -Aala), [4]. In the Zabid area special water
rights have been formulated approximately 500 years ago. These
rights make maximum use of the base flow and periodic floods
by means of a time and space relationship based on the experience
of centuries. The irrigated areas supplied by the 16 canals
were divided into three groups. The timing and frequency of
water intake were defined for each group as shown in table
(1.2). In 1996 the existing water rights law still recognized
[3].
Wadi Zabid irrigation system
has 5 diversion structures with 9 head regulators (see figure
1.3) serving 16 canals (see table 1.3), which allow the available
spate flows to be allocated in accordance with the traditional
water rights [4].
The average quantity of suspended
sediment in an average year in Wadi Zabid is about 3,000,000
tons (1,600,000 ) and the bed load is about 430,000 tons (240,000
) [1]. The sediment concentration especially in the sand size
rages rises to more than 10% by weight during large floods
[6].
1.1.2 Existing Problems in the
Irrigation System
There are two kinds of problems,
affecting the irrigation system namely operation and maintenance
problems sedimentation problems. These problems would be described
in the following sections.
1.1.2.1
Operation and Maintenance Problems
The main problem in the operation and maintenance is the inadequate
control of the head works to divert the Wadi flows to the
irrigation canals. This problem occurred by the following:
A. The erosion of the concrete in the head regulators and
sluiceway: -
This erosion occurs as a result of filling of the headwork
pool to the weir crest level by
sediment, which caused the flow velocity to increase until
it exceeded the design
velocity. Also erosion was caused by big stones, which were
carried by large floods and
passed through the sluiceway or over the weir crest causing
severe damages to the crest,
the weir body and stilling basing.
B. The intake was incapable to divert sufficient irrigation
water: -
i- The bed level has been increased in the head reach, especially
behind the gates as shown in pictures (1)
ii- Decreased of the bed slope in the head reach behind the
gates, which was caused by sediment deposition in this place.
iii- The level of the sluiceway and the intake was at the
same level, which caused the sluiceway to flush sediments
only to the level of the intake gates.
C. The erosion of the canal sides: -
i- Change the flow direction in the canals.
ii- The soil was too loose at the canal sides; there were
no banks stabilization made from stones or stone mattresses.
iii- In some places along the canals the farmers plant crops
on thecanal sides, which resulted in canal flows to erode
soil banks.
D. Problems due to the lack of any light during the nights
and due to the no operation of the sluiceways on Fridays and
during holiday.
1.1.2.2 Sediment Problems in
the Irrigation Canals
The sediment deposition was
the main problem in the irrigation system, which was in fact
a result of mismanagement of the control structures. The medium
and large floods always carried heavy bed and suspended loads,
which was deposited when the velocity decreased in the pool
until the sediments accumulated up to the weir crest level
and then the sediment is deposited in front and behind the
intake gates of the head regulator. Then the sediment entered
the irrigation canal and is deposited in the head reach and
along the canals. This sediment deposition prevented the head
regulator to control the Wadi flood flow in a correct way.
The sediment
deposition caused the following problems
1. The sediment deposition upstream of the weirs increased
the bed level of the pool up to the weir crest. See picture
(2)
2. Canal bed level increased, especially in the head reaches;
3. Field levels increased; the level became higher than the
water surface level in the main canal so the fields cannot
be irrigated any more. See picture (3)
4. A reduction of the canal flow capacity lead to insufficient
flows to meet the irrigation requirements;
5. Complete closure of the fields off takes. See picture (4)
6. High costs for the mechanical sediment removal, especially
when the canal banks became very high due to the deposition
of the removed sediments.
7. The coarse sediment and debris blocked off-takes pipes
and the secondary canal bed rose especially in front of and
behind the off-takes. See pictures (1 and 4).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Sediment transport studies
in the Tihama plain
Several sediment transport studies
were carried out in the Tihama wadis as part of the various
visibilities / design studies of the irrigation systems in
these wadis such as the following: -
1) TESCO -VIZTERV -VlTUKI, (1971): This firm investigated
the suspended sediment and bed load transportation in Wadi
Zabid main canals. They estimated the quantity of suspended
sediments and bed load in an average year at 3 and 4 million
tons/year.
2) TIPTON and KALMBACH, (1980): This firm used DH-59 sampler,
with a series of single-stage samplers at the gauging site
at Wadi Mawr. The sediment concentration measurements were
made for discharges ranging from 2-90 . They defined that
the suspended sediments, concentration varies from 150 to
50,000 ppm.
3) LAWRENCE, (1986 and 1987): This firm made a study to predict
the sediments concentration in Wadi Zabid irrigation system
concluded that the sediments concentration during high floods
could reach 10% by weight.
4) NESPAK, (1989): This firm made a study to predict the sediments
concentration in Wadi Siham main channel. The measurements
were made at two stations with discharges of 2 and 12 . They
concluded that the sediments concentrations at the two flows
were 10,000 ppm and 23,000 ppm respectively.
2.2
Data collection and measurements
This study was partly carried out in the field at which measurements
of the discharges, the particle size, the cross-section profiles
and the longitudinal profiles for parts of the canals were
investigated and partly in the labs. During the laboratory
and field experiments several measuring equipment and apparatuses
were used, such as current meter, bed load sediment sampler,
suspended sediment sampler, leveling equipment, stopwatch,
filter paper, etc. This part would provide a short outline
of the types of measurements and the experiments conducted,
their purpose and the equipment used.
2.2.1 Longitudinal Profile and
Cross-sections Measurements
The longitudinal profile was
measured to find the bed level elevation at several parts
along the canal to estimate the sediment deposition in the
canal bed. The profile was measured by leveling equipment
(level, staff, etc). The measurements of the profile were
taken at the centre of the canal bed and at an interval of
100 m along the canal. During the fieldwork two profiles were
measured; one for the Bunny-Barry canal with 2700 m long (see
figure 1.3) for the whole profile. The second profile was
for the Mawi- Yusifi canal with a total length of 2100 m (see
figure 1.4) for the whole profile. The cross-sections were
measured to find the elevation and shape of the canal at specific
points and at different dates.
2.2.2 Measurements of particle
size, discharge, and velocity
2.2.3 Particle size measurements
A sufficient large portion of
bed material (not less than 500 g) was taken from the sample
and put in an oven at 110 °C for 24 hours. The dried sample
was then put in a mechanical sieve apparatus and sieved for
15 minute. The weight retained and the percentages passing
were determined and the grading curves were drawn. A comparison
of the grading curves were compared with those of Lawrence
(1983) [6], showed clearly that the bed material of the measured
curves was coarser than those curves made by Lawrence (1983)
[6], which was due to the following reasons:
a) The increase in bed slope.
b) The use of the total flow during small to medium floods
without flushing of the sluice
gate, especially at the beginning of every flood during the
irrigation period
c) Sediment accumulation in the pool behind the weir until
it reaches the intake entrance.
A sufficient large portion (mass)
from the sample, which was brought from the field as suspended
load, was washed through the sieve no.200 (0.075µm) in order
to obtain a mass of 500 g. This mass was placed in the oven
at 110 °C for 24 hours to dry.
2.2.3.1 Discharge and velocity
measurements
The discharge at a given section
could be measured by several methods such as: current meter
method, float method or dilution method. The choice of the
method depended on the conditions present at the site. To
facilitate comparison, the sites chosen for discharge measurements
were the same as those selected by Lawrence during his 1982-1983
fieldwork. The accuracy of the discharge measurement depended
on the number of verticals at which the depth and the velocity
were measured. The position of the verticals should be in
line with the variation in canal bed elevation and the horizontal
variation in velocity. The width between any two verticals
should not be more than 1/20 of the total width. The channel
width was measured from a fixed reference point (usually the
initial point on the bank). A graduated tape determined the
distance between verticals and the depth was measured with
the graduated metal rod of the current meter.
The velocity was measured at
one or more points in each vertical. The velocity was then
determined by counting the revolutions of the propeller of
the meter during 50 seconds at every point. The average velocity
was determined by the three-point method, which took the velocity
observations in each vertical at 0.2, 0.6, and 0.8 intervals
of the total water depth measured from the water surface.
The average of the three values gave the mean or average velocity
in the vertical.
3. Results And Discussion
3.1 Canals Longitudinal Profiles
and Cross Sections
The elevation surveys of Bunny-Barry
and Mawi-Yusifi canals were done during the fieldwork. From
these surveys the bed levels were computed and compared with
the designed bed levels (as shown in figures 1.3 and 1.4).
A deposition of sediment occurred in all canals reaches, but
it was most severe in the head reaches of canals close to
the head regulator and at the upper portions of every reach
before the drop structure. The deposition at the head reach
caused the canal bed level to increase to the extent that
water level became higher than that in the upstream of the
head regulator.
3.1.1 The Bunny-Barry canal
longitudinal profile shows:
There was much sediment deposition
in the head reach of this canal and little erosion in the
downstream reaches (as shown in figure 1.3). The present longitudinal
1996 profile for the downstream reaches appeared lower than
the design and other profiles which were measured in the previous
years. However, the head reach profiles for the years 1996
and 1983 survey were similar due to a high sediment deposition
and the widening of the canal. The following observations
can be made: -
i. Large sediment deposition
in the head reach of the canal (from 0 to 600 mdownstream
the
head regulator) especially the first 300 m. The deposition
of sediments decreased along the
canal in a downstream direction until erosion occurred near
the end of the reach.
ii. Less sediment deposition was observed in the 600 to 1250
m reach.
This sediment deposition also decreased in a downstream direction
until erosion was
observed at the end reach;
iii. In the 1250 to 2000 m and 2150 to 2730 m reaches much
erosion has been observed.
This erosion of the canal bed was due to an increase of the
bed slope and flow
velocities.In the 2150 to 2730 m reach erosion increased with
time (as shown in
figure 1.3) and due to the increase in bed slope which increased
the flow velocity;
iv. In the 2000 to 2150 m reach a balanced condition for erosion
and deposition was
observed, especially for the present survey.
The cross-sections profiles
of Bunny-Barry canal showed both the rise in canal bed levels
and the reduction in canal width in the downstream reaches.
The reduction of canal width in the downstream canal cross-sections
was partly due to the natural deposition of sediments in the
canal side where the flow velocity is slower. The second reason
for reduction of canal width was the disposal of sediment
on the canal banks and there back filling into the canal sides.
The cross section at the head reaches was enlarged forming
a small settling basin immediately downstream of the head
regulator. The bed level at section no.1 during the present
survey was about 1.0 m above the design full supply level.
The accumulation of sediment caused a reduction of both the
canal intake capacity and the bed slope near the head regulator.
Cross section no.1 (figure 1.5) shows the enlarge section
since the 1987 survey, which could be the result of sediment
removal from the canal bed to the canal bank. However, there
was a reduction in the cross-section area and erosion in the
canal bed at the downstream reaches (section. 2, 3 and figures
1.6 and 1.7). The erosion in the canal bed was due to the
increase of bed slope and flow velocities, and the sediments
clearance before the present measurements
3.1.2 The Mawi-Yusifi canal
longitudinal profile shows
Substantial depositions of sediments
occurred, especially at the head reach near the head regulator
(0 to 429 m reach) and after drop structures 1 and 2. The
deposition in these reaches was about 1.5 m thick at the upper
part, which decreased, in a downstream direction forming a
very steep bed slope (as shown in figure1.4). This figure
also shows similar but thinner layer of sediment in the (429
to 800 m, 800 to 1580 m and 1580 to 2100 m) reaches.
From the longitudinal profile,
the sediment deposition height reached about 1.5 m above the
canal bed at some places (as shown in figure 1.4). This canal
need sediments clearance to prevent the sediment transport
of coarse materials through the downstream reaches and finally
to the fields.
Comparing the existing canal
bed slope for each reach (as determined from the profiles
data) with the design or built bed slopes (see table 1.4),
it became clear that the bed slop has increased with time
due to the sedimentation on the canal bed and the erosion
of this bed in some reaches due to the increased bed slopes
and flow velocities. The results in table (1.4) show that
the average in the bed slopes of Bunny-Barry was about 1.6
times the design bed slope except at the head reach where
this increase was about 2.6 times the design bed slope.
The overall increase in bed slope of Mawi-Yusifi is about
9 times the built slopes in all the sections. At the head
reaches and upper portion of some reaches the sediment deposit
was around 1.5 m above canal built bed level.
Finally, for all canals the
most significant impact of sedimentation occurred at the canal
head reach, near the head regulator. This sedimentation may
reduce the diverted water to the canals especially when the
bed level closer to the intake becomes higher than the intake
bed level. In this case the sediment had to be removed (mechanically)
in order to increase the diverted wafer to the canals and
to minimize transporting sediments downstream through the
canal an finally to the fields.
3.2 Canal Bed Materials
Bed materials samples were collected
from various locations along the Bunny-Barry canal and from
the Mawi-Yusifi canals. The bed material of Bunny-Barry canal
was found to consist of coarse sand and gravel at the head
reach (see section 1 of figure 1.8) and coarse to fine sand
at the downstream (see sections 2 and 3 of figures 1.9 and
1.10, respectively). The comparison of the grading curves
of the Bunny-Barry canal profile observed by Lawrence and
the present grading curve from Mawi-Yusifi canal (see figure
1.11), clearly demonstrated that the bed material of the measured
curves was a little bit coarser than that mad by Lawrence
(1983) (6). This due the following reasons:
a. The increase in canal bed
slope.
b. The use of the total flow during small to medium floods,
without sluiceway flushing especially at the beginning of
every flood during the irrigation period.
c. Sediment accumulation in the pool until it reaches the
intake entrance, which allows the coarse bed load to enter
to canal head reach.
The close to the head reach
(in the first 100 m) ranges from 30 to 17 mm in size and reduces
in the downstream reaches to 0.36 mm. This bed material was
a little bit coarser than that observed by Lawrence in 983.
The suspended sediments, which
enter the fields, cause elevation of the soil surface, which
eventually caused difficulties in irrigating the fields from
the usual off-take. To overcome these difficulties, farmers
usually lay down a temporary earth dykes to pond the water
up to enter the fields. These dykes retained the sediment
behind them and causing canal bed rising
The sediment quantities, which entered an irrigation canal,
were estimated from the field measurement for two floods:
one in Bunnay-Barry canal (section no.1 at 100 m downstream
head regulator) and one for Mawi-Yusifi canal (section no.
1 at 100 m D/S head regulator). The rate of sedimentation
was about 39 ton/ day for Bunnay-Barry canal and 126 ton /
day for Mawi-Yusifi canal.
Moreover, from the economical
point view, the field data indicates that the clearance of
sediments from the canals costs 700 YR /ton (5.6 US $/ ton).
So the sedimentation of one day will cost about 30,000 YR
/day 240 US $/day) for Bunnay-Barry canal and 90,000 YR /
day (720 US /dy) for Mawi-Yusifi canal. According to the rate
sediment predicted during this study the total costs per season
(for 45 days floods) are 1,350,000 YR /year (10,800 Us $ /year)
and 4,050,000 YR / year (32,400 U5$/year) respectively.
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
Based on the results and discussion
in the preceding sections, the following conclusions can be
drawn:
1- The deposition of sediment
along the irrigation canals in Wadi Zabid caused change in
canal bed slope and cross section.
2- The operation of sluiceway was not sufficient to eliminate
the bed load from the flow before entering the canal.
3- There was no use of sediment control structures.
4- Farmers should be prevented from constructing earth dykes
across the canals to raise water levels.
5- High sediment concentration naturally existed in Wadi Zabid
especially during medium to high floods (which reached 100,000
ppm in very high floods; according to Lawrence, 1986) (6)
required thorough investigation in order to prevent sediment
deposition in the systems.
6- Canal maintenance and removal of coarse sediments from
the head reaches would prevent sediments from transporting
further down stream the canal systems and to the fields. The
coarse sediment transported to the fields caused blockage
of the off-takes pipe and changed the fields soil uniformity,
which will negatively affect the planting practices
7- The sediment deposition at the head reaches near the intakes
resulted in a large reduction in the quantities of diverted
water for irrigation especially during medium to large floods.
8- More water could be diverted to the canals if the openings
intake gates were adjusted during medium to large floods and
the sediments were always removed from the head reach.
4.2 Recommendations
In order to improve Wadi Zabid
irrigation system (by reducing the sedimentation problem through
the irrigation canals and minimizing the sediment clearance
costs) the following recommendations are made:
1. The head reach of the irrigation canals needs more frequent
sediment clearance than the down stream reaches in order to
keep its bed level as constructed in order to increase the
diverted water to the canals (especially during medium to
large floods) and to reduce the coarse bed materials transportable
to the downstream reaches
2. The canals intakes gates should be adjusted during medium
to large floods and sluiceway should be operated according
to the operating procedures. This will increase the diverted
water to the canals (especially during medium to large floods)
and to reduce the coarse bed martial that entered to the canals.
3. The heavy sediment load could be prevented from entering
the irrigation canals by closing the head regulators intake
gates and excluding all flows with heavy sediment concentration
for 15 to 20 minutes at the beginning of floods (especially
during medium to large floods)
4. In order to minimize the bed load sediment in the irrigation
canal flow, sediment extractor (Vertex tube or Tunnel type)
could be constructed at the canals head reach
5. Several settle basins could be constructed along the canals
especially at the first two reaches from the head regulator
where much sedimentation occurs. These settle basins would
be easer to clean than clearing the entire canal reaches.
6. For maintenance purposes the irrigation canals could be
divided into several sections with specific users being responsible
for each section close to their lands. The maintenance and
cleaning of the irrigation canals should be the responsibility
of the various users, each in respect to his irrigated area.
This would minimize the sedimentation problem and avoid the
bed-load sediment transport to the fields, and would decrease
the maintenance cost.
References
[1] TESCO, " Survey of
the Agricultural Potential of Wadi Zabid in Yemen", Technical
Report No. 12, Budabest , Hungary ,1971.
[2] Scheitz, E. L., " Certain Aspects and Problems of
Wadi Development ", Vizier
Consulting Company, Budabest, Hungary, 1987.
[3] NESPAK, " Wadi Siham Project Inception Report ",
Mai Report, TDA, Yemen, 1989
[4] Tahir, T.M. " Traditional Water Rights Versus Water
Availability- Case Study Wadi
Siham ", Water Resources In the Arab World Conference,
Tripoli, Libya, 1996.
[5] Lawrence, P. et al, "Sediment Control in Wadi Irrigation
Systems ", Hydraulic Research,
Wallingford, UK, 1986
[6] Lawrence, P. et al, " Wadi Zabid Diversion Structures-Field
Performance Measurements
", Report No. 73, Hydraulic Research, Wallingford, UK,
1983
Appendix

Figure 1.1 Topographical map showsTihama plain and Wadi.

Figure 1.2 Wadi Zabid Irrigation
Systems

Figure 1.3: Longitudinal
profile of Bunay-Barry cana

Figure 1.4 Mawi-Yyusifi longitudinal
profile

Picture (1) sediment deposition
in front of the gate with coarse sediments

Picture (2) Sediment deposition upstream of the weir increases
the bed level of the pool up to the weir crest

Picture (3) Deposition of sediments U/S of a drop showing
the severe change and increase in the canal bed level.

Picture (4) Complete closure of off take
-
Tables
|